January 4, 2024

To subscribe to this FREE weekly newsletter simply email jellison@san.rr.com with “subscribe” as the subject.

LITIGATION TRACKER ... Trump Trials Clearinghouse

https://www.justsecurity.org/88175/trump-trials-clearinghous

THE WEEK'S BEST QUOTES. . .

“It’s not good. The best way to describe it… take armpits, ketchup, a butt and makeup and put that all in a blender and bottle that as a cologne. That’s kind of that. I’ve been amazed that everybody is just kind of learning about this now.” — Former Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-IL) revealing new details about Donald Trump’s alleged bad odor. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-smells-kinzinger-armpits-ketchup-b2471229.html

‘Donald Trump’s name does not belong on the ballot. The plain language of the 14th Amendment, barring federal officials who’ve engaged in insurrection from holding office again, makes that clear. The Colorado Supreme Court agrees. Some very smart, very conservative constitutional scholars agree. So does Maine’s secretary of state. This isn’t about politics; it’s about the Constitution setting bare-minimum qualifications for office, and Trump failing to meet those qualifications.’  — Paul Thornton. https://www.latimes.com/opinion/newsletter/2023-12-30/opinion-newsletter-trump-disqualified-ballot-2024-opinion

“I don’t believe in welfare.” — Gov. Jim Pillen (R-Nebraska) on Friday reiterated his rejection of $18 million in federal funding to help feed children who might otherwise go hungry while school is out. https://apnews.com/article/nebraska-summer-ebt-food-program-children-789f2d04bd195086d2e41d0d43b8111c

“Donald Trump’s bold claims that he’s immune from criminal prosecution over his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election ‘threaten to undermine democracy.'” — Special counsel Jack Smith to a federal appeals court. https://www.politico.com/news/2023/12/30/special-counsel-trump-immunity-claim-threatens-democracy-0013335

“On my first day back in office, I will terminate every open borders policy of the Biden administration and immediately restore the full set of strong Trump border policies. Then, we will begin a record-setting deportation operation. The millions of illegal aliens who have invaded under Biden require a record number of removals. ” — Donald Trump. https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/opinion/columnists/caucus/2024/01/03/donald-trump-joe-biden-border-disaster/72093156007/

 
“When we are looking at Gaza, and if we believe the data that we have from the World Health Organization, there is one shower for every forty-five hundred people, there is one toilet for every two hundred and twenty people. More than 1.5 million people are staying in a very congested place. This is a recipe for a pandemic, too. Now, who’s the most vulnerable to something like this? Obviously, it’s the children.” —  Isaac Chotiner. https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/gaza-is-starving

 

“Yes, the US debt hit a record $34 trillion today. In case anyone forgot how we arrived at this moment in history.”  https://twitter.com/DukeSkymocker/status/1742578809948303710
 

VIDEOS ...

“Some people say I should drop out of this race. Really? I’m the only one saying Donald Trump is a liar. He pits Americans against each other,” he says in the ad running in the Granite State. His Christmas message to anyone who disagrees with him? ‘Rot in Hell.’ He caused a riot on Capitol Hill — he’ll burn America to the ground to help himself,” — Chris Christie. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L27rQPzNv9s

IN THIS ISSUE

IN THE NEWS

OPINION

IN THE NEWS...  

Brace Yourself for Next Year

“It finally arrived: the last day of a long, wild year in politics. And now, we can all look forward to a very quiet, calm year that could (1) see a rematch of the last presidential election, (2) find the Supreme Court deciding if a former president should be tossed off state ballots for being an insurrectionist, (3) feature that same former president prosecuted on nearly 100 charges and (4) witness the current president get impeached for unknown reasons.”  https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook/2023/12/31/the-3-unpredictable-factors-shaping-2024-00133360
 

Trump Accuses Cheney of Destroying Evidence

Donald Trump used Truth Social to accuse former Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY) of destroying evidence related to the January 6, 2021 Capitol riots, making it impossible for his lawyers to defend him in the criminal case against him. https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/111683296409531201

Republican loyalty to Trump and rioters climbs in 3 years after Jan. 6 attack

Three years after the Jan. 6 attack, Republicans are more sympathetic to those who stormed the U.S. Capitol and more likely to absolve Donald Trump of responsibility for the attack than they were in 2021, according to a Washington Post-University of Maryland poll.

Republicans’ increasing loyalty to the former president comes as he simultaneously campaigns for reelection and fights criminal charges over his attempt to stay in power after losing in 2020. Republicans are now less likely to believe Jan. 6 participants were mostly violent, less likely to believe Trump bears responsibility for the attack and are slightly less likely to view Joe Biden’s election as legitimate than they were in a December 2021 Post-UMD survey. https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2024/01/02/jan-6-poll-post-trump/

The 2024 Wildcard

Unenthusiastic about either of their likely choices for president, many Americans say they want more, seeding the ground for a possible bumper crop of third-party and independent presidential candidates next year, NBC News reports.

While their chances of actually winning the White House may be tiny, the likelihood of several extra candidates on the ballot could tip a close election and will further complicate an already muddied picture of the divided American electorate.

That uncertainty is already troubling both parties, but especially Democrats, who worry third-party candidates could spoil the election for them as they say Green Party candidates did in 2016 and 2000, though insiders acknowledge it may be impossible to predict what happens in a five- or six-way race. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/2024-wild-card-banner-year-third-party-candidates-rcna129937

The Economist’s ‘World Ahead’ Guide Declares Donald Trump The Biggest Global Threat In 2024

The biggest danger the world faces in 2024 is if former President Donald Trump is elected to a second term, according to The Economist’s guide to The World Ahead.

In the 38 years since the predictive guide was first published, “no single person has ever eclipsed our analysis as much as Donald Trump eclipses 2024,” the article begins. It goes on to ponder what a Trump victory would mean for the world and claims that parliaments and boardrooms the world over are filled with “despair” at what may come:
A second Trump term would be a watershed in a way the first was not. Victory would confirm his most destructive instincts about power. His plans would encounter less resistance. And because America will have voted him in while knowing the worst, its moral authority would decline. The election will be decided by tens of thousands of voters in just a handful of states. In 2024 the fate of the world will depend on their ballots.
Trump would move his MAGA Republican allies into “the most important positions” in government, the article predicts, and Trump would be “unbound in his pursuit of retribution, economic protectionism and theatrically extravagant deals.”

The article posits that a Trump win would signal to China that American democracy is “dysfunctional,” and could give the communist nation the incentive to invade its island neighbor, Taiwan. In addition, the article predicts that Trump’s desire to quickly end the war in Ukraine would give Vladimir Putin the impetus to take over other neighboring countries like Moldova and the Baltic states.

This year’s article resigns itself to the possibility that no one will end up “dispatching” Trump. https://www.mediaite.com/politics/the-economists-world-ahead-guide-declares-donald-trump-the-biggest-global-threat-in-2024/
 

Inside the Trump Plot to Turn His Jan. 6 Trial Into a ‘MAGA Freak Show’

Attempts to drag Nancy Pelosi into court to berate her on the stand and, hopefully, on live TV. Claims that the Jan. 6 Capitol attack was an FBI frame job, with an assist from Antifa. Conspiracy theories that the 2020 election was indeed ‘stolen,’ supposedly backed up by still-classified documents. Unhinged assertions that President Joe Biden is now secretly, personally orchestrating an unprecedented act of political persecution. Calls to publicly unmask the federal officials and lawyers investigating the former (and perhaps future) president of the United States. Efforts to blame any illegality on some of the ex-president’s closest confidants and former legal allies. Insinuations of election meddling by the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah.

These are just some of the items that former President Donald Trump and his lawyers have been discussing and planning to deploy when he goes on trial for his efforts to steal the 2020 election. The brewing defense strategy is outlandish and feral, even by Trumpland standards, to the point that it’s baffling some of the ex-president’s former lawyers and senior administration officials.

One person with knowledge of these strategic and legal discussions bluntly describes the plans as a blueprint for staging a ‘MAGA freak show’ at Trump’s federal election subversion trial. https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/trump-plot-to-turn-jan-6-trial-into-maga-freak-show-1234938951/
 

‘Storm the Capitol’ Board Game Commemorates January 6 Rioters

A new board game, “Storm the Capitol,” is being released this weekend to commemorate the January 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol, Newsweek reports.
From the game’s website: “Take control of one of 6 Patriots as you battle through the Capitol, collecting ballots, taking hostages, and fighting the police. Or play as the Capitol Police and use every means at your disposal to prevent the Patriots from getting to the roof with enough ballots to Stop the Steal.” https://www.newsweek.com/storm-capitol-board-game-celebrates-jan-6-rioters-1857192

Texas Appeals Court Says Life-Saving Abortions Not Required

Federal regulations do not require emergency rooms to perform life-saving abortions if it would run afoul of state law, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday.

After the overturn of Roe v. Wade in June 2022, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services sent hospitals guidance, reminding them of their obligation to offer stabilizing care, including medically necessary abortions, under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act.

Texas sued, saying this was tantamount to a ‘nationwide mandate that every hospital and emergency-room physician perform abortions.’ https://www.texastribune.org/2024/01/02/texas-abortion-fifth-circuit/
 

Trump Legal News: Born under a Bad Sign

It flew under the radar a bit, thanks to the holidays, but Jack Smith filed another motion with Judge Tanya Chutkan on Dec. 27. And it's yet another one that makes clear that Donald Trump is up against a real pro.

The focus of the motion is exactly what evidence Trump can, and cannot, introduce at trial. In short, what Smith is asking is that Chutkan proactively prohibit the defense from introducing irrelevant political issues or arguments, such as the deep state is behind this or 1/6 was the fault of Nancy Pelosi or George Soros is paying for the government to conduct this trial. Smith observes that such assertions are invalid, and unsupported with evidence, but could still be prejudicial with the jury.

It is already against the rules for attorneys to make claims in court that they conjured up out of thin air; Smith knows this and Chutkan knows this. What Smith has done is comb through Trump's public statements, and identify 10 lines of attack that Trump has raised and that are not legally valid. What the Special Counsel wants is for the judge to preemptively warn the defense that those 10 subject areas are a waste of the Court's time, and will not be tolerated.

This is a very shrewd move by Smith, since it's likely Chutkan will make a pre-trial ruling in support of his position. And even if she doesn't, then everyone involved is nonetheless on notice as to exactly what distractor arguments the defense is likely to make. That will tend to make those distractor arguments less effective, and harder to get away with. It is also the case that even though the Washington trial is technically on hold, while the question of presidential immunity is dealt with, Smith is still making progress.

For the next several months, Trump's calendar is going to constantly jump back and forth between court dates and primaries/caucuses. And we're only talking cases where he is the defendant; not the procedural matters that the Supreme Court will be dealing with.

There is not much that can pierce Trump's teflon, however, if any voters are having doubts about the former president because of his legal woes, those doubts are going to be reinforced on a daily basis by headlines about this trial or that one. https://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2024/Items/Jan02-1.html
 

Hispanic Leaders Warn Democrats

President Joe Biden is heading into 2024 with concerning numbers among Hispanic voters: A new USA Today/Suffolk survey shows him trailing Donald Trump by five percentage points, with many reluctant to back either candidate. While it’s an especially rough poll, others have also shown him struggling to match his 2020 numbers with a key swath of the Democratic base — and Hispanic leaders say they’re seeing the same problems on the ground.

Conversations with leaders of Hispanic groups and political consultants in both parties underscored Biden’s difficult path forward. https://www.semafor.com/article/01/02/2024/hispanic-leaders-warn-democrats-voters-are-fed-up-with-biden

Trump’s GOP rivals promise to pardon him if they are elected

The leading candidate for the Republican presidential nomination faces 91 criminal charges, nearly half of which are at the federal level. And yet his two main GOP rivals have said they would pardon him if they’re elected.

Donald Trump faces 40 federal charges connected to his handling of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago estate, as well as another four federal charges stemming from his attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 election.

He faces another 34 felonies in New York, where he is accused of falsifying business records stemming from hush money payments to Stormy Daniels, and another 13 in Georgia, where he is accused of leading a criminal racketeering enterprise to overturn the state’s election results.

Meanwhile, campaigning in the days leading up to the first votes of 2024’s Republican primary elections, Ron DeSantis and Nikki Haley have both signalled they would grant clemency to the former president because it would be in the nation’s interest to do so. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-pardon-desantis-haley-b2471805.html
 

Lawsuit seeks to remove Scott Perry from Pennsylvania ballot using 14th amendment

 A lawsuit has been filed in Pennsylvania’s Commonwealth Court to remove Republican U.S. House Representative Scott Perry from the 2024 ballot due to the 14th Amendment’s insurrection clause.

The lawsuit, which was filed on January 2 by Harrisburg-area activist and former congressional candidate Gene Stilp, calls for Pennsylvania’s Secretary of State Al Schmidt to remove Perry from the ballot ahead of the spring’s 10th Congressional District primary. https://www.abc27.com/pennsylvania-politics/lawsuit-seeks-to-remove-scott-perry-from-pennsylvania-ballot-using-14th-amendment/

X (formerly known as Twitter) gets another valuation cut from Fidelity

Fidelity has again marked down the value of its shares in X Holdings, which the mutual fund giant helped Elon Musk buy for $44 billion when the company was known as Twitter.

Fidelity believes that X is worth 71.5% less than at the time of purchase, according to a new disclosure that runs through the end of November 2023 (Fidelity revalues private shares on a one-month lag). https://www.axios.com/2023/12/31/elon-musks-x-fidelity-valuation-cut
 

U.S. puts forward G7 plan to confiscate $300bn in Russian assets

The U.S. has proposed that working groups from the G7 explore ways to seize $300bn in frozen Russian assets, as the allies rush to agree a plan in time for the second anniversary of Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. https://www.ft.com/content/d206baa8-3ec9-42f0-b103-2c098d0486d9

Russia is working to subvert French support for Ukraine

As Kyiv’s counteroffensive — and Western funding for it — falters and as governments in Europe battle rising living costs, plunging approval ratings and the rise of far-right populists, Jean-Luc Schaffhauser, a former member of the European Parliament for Le Pen’s party and his Russian associates see fresh opportunity.

Russia has been increasing its efforts to undermine French support for Kyiv — a hidden propaganda front in Western Europe that is part of the war against Ukraine, according to Kremlin documents and interviews with European security officials and far-right political figures.

The maneuvering — and Kremlin connections with a host of far-right parties across Europe, including in France — are worrying some European officials ahead of European Parliament elections in June. Josep Borrell, the E.U.’s foreign policy chief, warned at a conference this month that those elections could be “as dangerous as the American ones,” driven by “fear” in response to growing inequality and security threats. “Europe is in danger,” he said.

The Kremlin documents, obtained by a European security service and reviewed by The Washington Post, show that Sergei Kiriyenko, the first deputy chief of staff in President Vladimir Putin’s administration, has tasked Kremlin political strategists with promoting political discord in France through social media and French political figures, opinion leaders and activists. Those figures were not identified by name in the documents seen by The Post. Moscow’s goal is to undermine support for Ukraine and weaken NATO resolve, the documents show. The effort parallels similar interference in Germany, where the Kremlin has attempted to marry the far right and the far left in an antiwar alliance. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/12/30/france-russia-interference-far-right/

Biden’s Crime Problem: Violent Crime Is Down, but Voters Don’t Believe It

That’s a problem for President Joe Biden’s re-election campaign, as Republicans are gearing up to use the issue as a central attack against the president, seizing on voter fears about violent crime even as federal data show almost all kinds of crime are falling nationally.

Republicans, aided by conservative outlets like Fox News and others, have long focused on crime, particularly rising rates in urban areas dominated by Democrats and flashy crime rings that have overwhelmed security at department stores to steal thousands of dollars worth of merchandise. But Republican attacks on Biden have taken on a new edge, aimed particularly at convincing voters that the crime rates in urban areas are a precursor to what will be felt across the country if Biden is reelected. https://themessenger.com/politics/bidens-crime-problem-violent-crime-is-down-but-voters-dont-believe-it

Trump doesn't have immunity from Jan. 6 civil suit brought by U.S. Capitol Police officers, appeals court says

A federal appeals court on Friday allowed a lawsuit brought by a group of U.S. Capitol Police officers against former President Donald Trump to move forward, ruling that Trump is not entitled to absolute immunity from civil lawsuits.

The suit focuses on Trump’s alleged conduct surrounding the Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol.

The three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit based its decision on a ruling in a separate case brought by two Capitol Police officers and a group of House Democrats that was handed down earlier this month. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-jan-6-immunity-us-capitol-police-officers-civil-suit-appeals-court/

Trump Staffer Identified as a Capitol Rioter

Oliver Krvaric, a young Republican star and scion of a powerful GOP family from San Diego, has been identified as one of the rioters at the Capitol on January 6.

He would also be the first full-time employee of the Trump administration identified entering the Capitol in the insurrection.

Asked whether he was at the Jan. 6 riot, Krvaric initially told USA Today he was not. Pressed about the photos that online researchers say show him that day, Krvaric acknowledged he attended former President Donald Trump’s speech, but said he didn’t go inside the Capitol. Asked about images that appear to show him inside the Capitol, he then said he didn’t remember whether he went inside. Sent copies and links to the footage, he stopped responding. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/investigations/2023/12/28/oliver-krvaric-jan-6-capitol-riot/71971697007/

Donald Trump Loses Effort to Delay E. Jean Carroll Defamation Case

E. Jean Carroll’s defamation trial against Donald Trump will go ahead in January after an appeals court rejected the former president’s motion to stay a previous ruling denying his attempt to use presidential immunity as a defense. https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/donald-trump-loses-motion-delay-e-jean-carroll-defamation-case-1234937597/

THE DAILY GRILL

"I think it always comes down to the role of government and what the rights of the people are. And I will always stand by the fact that I think government was intended to secure the rights and freedoms of the people. Government doesn’t need to tell you how to live your life, Haley continued. They need to make sure that you have freedom. We need to have capitalism. We need to have economic freedom. We need to make sure that we do all things so that individuals have the liberties so that they can have freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom to do or be anything they want to be without government getting in the way." — former South Carolina Gov. NIKKI HALEY responding to a voter at a New Hampshire town hall forum who asked Haley what caused the Civil War. https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook/2023/12/28/nikki-haleys-moment-of-crisis-00133265

VERSUS

"It doesn’t take a PhD to understand that slavery was the central cause of the civil war, but instead of telling it like it is, the entire MAGA field from Donald Trump on down are pandering to the most extreme fringe of their base. Minimize slavery, paraphrase HITLER, punish women and doctors — quite the record heading into the general election that will be the most diverse in history." -- A senior Biden adviser. https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook/2023/12/28/nikki-haleys-moment-of-crisis-00133265
 

“I have many wonderful friends wanting to be Speaker of the House, and some are truly great Warriors. RINO Tom Emmer, who I do not know well, is not one of them. He never respected the Power of a Trump Endorsement, or the breadth and scope of MAGA—MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! He fought me all the way, and actually spent more time defending Ilhan Omar, than he did me—He is totally out-of-touch with Republican Voters. I believe he has now learned his lesson, because he is saying that he is Pro-Trump all the way, but who can ever be sure? Has he only changed because that’s what it takes to win? The Republican Party cannot take that chance, because that’s not where the America First Voters are. Voting for a Globalist RINO like Tom Emmer would be a tragic mistake!”   — Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump. https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/111291340230348905

VERSUS

A little more than 2 months since he was forced to withdraw, House Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-MN) endorsed former President Donald Trump in the 2024 Republican primary, giving him the endorsement of the top four House Republicans going into the Iowa caucus later this month. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/house/tom-emmer-endorses-donald-trump.
OPINION  

David Frum: Suddenly, Trump Is Interested in Democracy

Trump himself launched his presidential career by arguing that President Barack Obama should not have been able to run for president because Obama was not a natural-born citizen of the United States. In 2016, Trump argued that his rival Ted Cruz should be disqualified as a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination because Cruz was born in Canada. (Unlike Trump’s fantasies about Obama, Trump was right on the facts about Cruz—just wrong on the law.)

In 2020, Trump tried to disqualify voters who’d exercised their right to vote by mail or whose ballots had for any reason not yet been counted by midnight on Election Day.

Trump and his supporters have conjured a series of self-serving rules. Where antique anti-majoritarian devices work for them, the antique anti-majoritarian devices prevail. Where crude gaming of filibusters and gerrymandering works for them, the crude gaming must prevail. Where fraud and violence work for them, fraud and violence must prevail. And where invoking democratic ideas works for them—well, you can complete the sentence. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/12/trump-maine-ballot/676987/

 

Bill Kristol and Jeffrey Tulis: The Threat from Trump Today Is Worse Than on January 6th

We now know much more about Donald Trump’s post-2020-election plans and actions than we did in the immediate aftermath of the attack on the Capitol. Yet Republican leaders and purveyors of GOP news no longer criticize January 6th—and much of the Republican base talks about it as if it were no big deal (calling it overblown), or as if it were a liberal conspiracy (a false-flag operation), or as if the members of the violent mob deserve our praise (calling them, rather than the police who fought them, the J6 heroes).

Where once there was widespread alarm and revulsion among Republicans about January 6th, today there is acquiescence or, at best, complacency. This brings home the severity of the threat to democracy posed now by the prospect of the re-election of Donald Trump.

What was once unthinkable and outrageous has become normalized over the last three years. Trump has responded to his political and legal losses by doubling down on the behavior and rhetoric for which he was denounced. His behavior was anticipated by the House managers in Trump’s first impeachment trial when they warned that if he were not convicted, he would feel emboldened to ignore or subvert the Constitution again. And he has been laying the groundwork for doing that for the last three years.

Since his second impeachment, Donald Trump has attacked every person and every institution involved in uncovering and reporting his misbehavior.

Most remarkably, Trump has embraced the notion that, if elected again, he will govern as a dictator. We have a detailed and very public record of how he plans to do that—including indications of the individuals he plans to appoint to key roles in his administration, a Heritage Foundation report on how to dismantle much of the federal government unilaterally without legislation from Congress, plans to use the Department of Justice to go after his critics and his political rivals, and plans to use the armed forces and larger national security apparatus for his domestic political purposes.

And Trump has the Republican party and the conservative movement in lockstep behind him. This is not one man, ostracized and shouting in the wilderness. It is not even Richard Nixon giving bitter interviews from exile, no longer a factor in American politics.

The leader of the January 6th insurrection is all but certain to be the presidential nominee of one of our two major parties. And polls suggest he has a very real chance to win the general election.

This is why we are in important ways in greater peril in January 2024 than we were in January 2021. https://plus.thebulwark.com/p/threat-from-trump-today-worse-than-january-6th

Chico Harlan: The climate future arrived in 2023. It left scars across the planet

Even if its extremes are ultimately eclipsed, as seems inevitable, 2023 will mark a point when humanity crossed into a new climate era — an age of “global boiling,” as United Nations Secretary General António Guterres called it. The year included the hottest single day on record (July 6) and the hottest ever month (July), not to mention the hottest June, the hottest August, the hottest September, the hottest October, the hottest November, and probably the hottest December. It included a day, Nov. 17, when global temperatures, for the first time ever, reached 2 degrees Celsius above the preindustrial levels.

Discomfort, destruction, and death are the legacy of those records.

In Phoenix, a heat wave went on for so long, with 31 consecutive days above 110 Fahrenheit, that one NASA atmospheric scientist called it “mind-boggling.” The surrounding county recorded a record number of heat deaths, nearly 600.

In Brazil, drought sapped the normally lush Amazon, causing towns to ration drinking water, contributing to the deaths of endangered pink dolphins, and choking off the river-based system of travel and commerce.

In the Antarctic, wintertime sea ice was at an all-time low. An unprecedented marine heat wave upended coral ecosystems. At one point the coastal Florida Keys waters reached 100 degrees, comparable to a hot tub.

This year will wind up as the first — and almost surely not the last — in which temperatures were at or near 1.5 Celsius above preindustrial levels, a threshold the Paris agreement has aimed to avoid. Though different climate tracking groups wind up with slightly different measurements of the global temperatures, most are within the same margin of error.

“All data sets tell us that we are uncomfortably close to 1.5 already,” said Carlo Buontempo, director of Europe’s Copernicus Climate Change Service, saying that 2023 had been so warm that even an immediate deep planetary freeze wouldn’t stop the year from breaking the all-time annual heat record.

“You’d need an asteroid hitting the planet, and even so I don’t know if you’d manage,” he said. “The anomalies this year are just that much off the charts.”
 https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2023/12/31/2023-record-heat-temperatures/

 

Adam Liptak: How the Supreme Court May Rule on Trump’s Presidential Run

The Supreme Court, battered by ethics scandals, a dip in public confidence and questions about its legitimacy, may soon have to confront a case as consequential and bruising as Bush v. Gore, the 2000 decision that handed the presidency to George W. Bush.

Until 10 days ago, the justices had settled into a relatively routine term. Then the Colorado Supreme Court declared that former President Donald J. Trump was ineligible to hold office because he had engaged in an insurrection. On Thursday, relying on that court’s reasoning, an election official in Maine followed suit.

An appeal of the Colorado ruling has already reached the justices, and they will probably feel compelled to weigh in. But they will act in the shadow of two competing political realities.

They will be reluctant to wrest from voters the power to assess Mr. Trump’s conduct, particularly given the certain backlash that would bring. Yet they will also be wary of giving Mr. Trump the electoral boost of an unqualified victory in the nation’s highest court.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. will doubtless seek consensus or, at least, try to avoid a partisan split of the six Republican appointees against the three Democratic ones.

He may want to explore the many paths the court could take to keep Mr. Trump on state ballots without addressing whether he had engaged in insurrection or even assuming that he had.

If there is a consensus among legal experts, it is that the Supreme Court must act.

“For the sake of the country, we need resolution of this issue as soon as possible,” said Richard L. Hasen, a law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles. “Republican primary voters deserve to know if the candidate they are considering supporting is eligible to run. Otherwise they waste their votes on an ineligible candidate and raise the risk of the party nominating an ineligible candidate in the general election.”

Mr. Trump was disqualified in Colorado and Maine based on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which bars officials who have taken an oath to support the Constitution from holding office if they then engage in an insurrection.

Professor Stephanopoulos said those determinations were legally sound. But he added that he was “highly skeptical” that the Supreme Court, which has a six-justice conservative supermajority, would agree. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/29/us/supreme-court-trump-election.html

 

Jonathan Last: Harvard Can’t Have a President Who Plagiarizes. But America *Can* Have a President Who Coups

I think we can agree that if plagiarism would get a student kicked out of Harvard then the president of Harvard can’t have committed plagiarism, yes? That makes sense. We need some standards.

So a question for the people braying for Claudine Gay’s scalp these last couple of weeks: What is your opinion on Donald Trump’s 2024 presidential bid?

Because it seems to me that anyone outraged that a mere plagiarist could hold the relatively humble position of university president would be spending every ounce of their strength trying to prevent a man who has been convicted of having committed sexual assault, is under 91 felony indictments, and who incited a motherforking insurrection to be President of the United States.

But you don’t see a lot of that, do you? Quite the opposite. Most of the people who were most exercised about Claudine Gay’s misdeeds are either anti-anti-Trump, or objectively pro-Trump. https://plus.thebulwark.com/p/harvard-cant-have-a-president-who


 

Steve Benen: Republican support for the ‘big lie’ moves in the wrong direction

The Washington Post reported on the latest national poll conducted with the University of Maryland:
Despite audits in multiple states and nationally televised congressional hearings in which state officials and aides to Trump confirmed there was no evidence of fraud in the 2020 election, more Americans question Biden’s victory than they did two years ago. When The Post and UMD asked in December 2021 whether Biden was legitimately elected, 69 percent of Americans said he was. Now, that’s down to 62 percent.

Of particular interest was the shift among self-identified Republicans: As 2021 came to a close, 39% of GOP voters said President Joe Biden’s election was legitimate. As 2023 wrapped up, that total was down to 31%, while 67% of Republicans said the Democratic incumbent was not legitimately elected, all evidence to the contrary notwithstanding.

What’s more, as the 2020 race faded from view, Republicans failed to produce any evidence to substantiate the lies, and policymakers’ attention shifted to governing, common sense suggested that even GOP die-hards would move on.

They have not - the percentage of Republican voters who are still getting this wrong isn’t just too high, it’s also getting worse.

So, as far as two-thirds of Republican voters are concerned, Trump not only won in 2016, he also won in 2020, no matter what reality says about the results. For much of the GOP electorate, the calculus is no doubt straightforward: As the party looks for the best possible contender for the 2024 race, why not go with the candidate who’s twice already proven he can win?

In other words, as Republican voters continue to embrace this obvious nonsense, the more important their rejection of reality becomes. https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/republican-support-big-lie-moves-wrong-direction-rcna131911